CBI says most experiences attributed to it in Sushant Singh Rajput case not ‘credible’ – india information

In its first official assertion issued since taking up the investigation final month into the demise of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) mentioned on Thursday that the small print being reported in numerous media concerning company probe usually are not “credible” or “primarily based on information”; however are “speculative” in nature.

The company mentioned it’s conducting an investigation into the demise of Rajput in a “systematic {and professional} method”.

“Sure media experiences attributed to CBI investigation are speculative and never primarily based on information,” mentioned CBI spokesperson R Ok Gaur.

Read Also:  Third events to report excessive worth transactions to establish tax evaders, says govt - india information

“It’s reiterated that as a matter of coverage, CBI doesn’t share particulars of ongoing investigation. CBI spokesperson or any staff member has not shared any particulars of the investigation with the media. The small print being reported and attributed to CBI usually are not credible,” he mentioned.

“It’s requested that the media could please verify particulars from a CBI spokesperson earlier than quoting CBI,” he added.

Within the final one week, the company has examined a number of individuals together with Rajput’s girlfriend Rhea Chakraborty, her members of the family in addition to the late actor’s pals, employees and so forth.

A ten-member Particular Investigation Crew (SIT) of CBI is at the moment stationed in Mumbai to analyze the circumstances during which Rajput was discovered useless in his residence on June 14.

“We’ve not concluded our investigations but. A whole lot of info is popping out every single day, largely unverified, therefore we determined to concern an announcement. The company’s line of investigation is thought to officers solely. We’ll apprise the court docket involved every time now we have one thing,” mentioned an officer who didn’t want to be named.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button